Sports and Sponsorship in Singapore

By Serena Tsang | November 17 2020, 10:20 AM SG

“I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been”. -Wayne Gretzky

When the 28th South East Asian Games was held in Singapore on 2015, the sponsorship value for the event alone had crossed the $70million mark1, with the inclusion of Deloitte as the biggest sponsor, upholding the industry’s reputation for opportunities and strategic brand association.

The nation had her eye set on the sponsorship industry when the inaugural Youth Olympic Games (YOG) announced its location being set in Singapore. Many doubted its success, some had little confidence based on similar experiences in local sporting events. Concerns lingered mostly on returns on investments and visibility, all which had subsequently proven otherwise, when the sponsorship value for YOG had been reported2

The value of sponsorship is usually determined by factors such as brand logo placement, brand visibility, mentions over events, rights of refusal, and footfall interactions. The cost, in turn, ranges from monetary contributions and in-kind contributions. For events as big as the above-mentioned major games, it should not be difficult to align sponsorship goals and achievements to gain success in an objective driven campaign. These goals, however, are slightly different when it comes to sponsoring the national sports associations (NSAs). Associations that spearhead the local communities in sports include providing training for homegrown athletes that perform on an elite level, representing the national flag on international grounds.

A brief chat with a few persons who are involved with their respective NSAs reveal a common struggle in offerings – companies look for success stories before signing a commitment that paves the NSA a path for success. On one hand, it makes perfect sense for sponsors to reduce the risk of unsuccessful investments, in terms of tangible returns. On the other, if companies do not take the opportunity to grow with a pre-successful association, the buy-in for sponsorship at later stages becomes more costly, all for the sake of branding and advertising.

PS-Engage has been a long-term sponsor of the Singapore Ice Hockey Association (SIHA). We found that by supporting the local community of our choice, it had brought us intangible connections and an invaluable sense of belonging through sports. The growth of the community over the years which we had been involved in is an assurance to our contributions and pride. We’ve taken the advice of Gretzky, to move towards where success will be, and not have been. As such, we encourage other businesses to do the same.

 

References:

  1. https://www.todayonline.com/sports/total-sea-games-sponsorship-crosses-s70-million-mark-kubota-deal
  2. https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/Games/YOG/Summer-YOG/YOG-Singapore-2010-Youth-Olympic-Games/YOG-Games-Impact-Study-Singapore-2010.pdf
Posted in

Related Articles

Dethroning the Dollar? Monetary Innovation and International Implications of China’s Digital RMB

By Brandon Chye | April 1, 2021, 11:30AM Photo by Carlos Muza on unsplash Continuing China’s monetary innovation Paper bills were first developed and printed en-masse in China during the 11th century, a major evolution complementing commodity-based payment instruments such as copper coins. This legacy still persists via the sovereign fiat banknotes that are used ubiquitously across different economies. […]

Things to Know Before Entering the Philippine Market

By Juan Carlos Eusebio| March 26, 2021, 12.00PM Photo by Alexes Gerard on unsplash The Philippines’ economy is considered one of the most dynamic economies in East Asia and the Pacific. In 2020, however, GDP contracted by an estimated 8.3% due to the outbreak of COVID-19. Nevertheless, according to the IMF’s October 2020 forecast, GDP […]

South Korea agonizes over the power of online platforms

By Somang Yang | March 18, 2021, 1:30PM Photo by Shawn Ang on unsplash As South Korea heads into an election year, there is no disagreement among the competing parties that the monopoly power of online platforms needs to be curbed. The only real source of debate is who will do the regulating, and how far […]